Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
-
Dinosaur
-
Originally Posted by
Excalibur
I'm a psychic.
I'd have a trial run first, see how they compare, sound wise and search wise.
i may or may not be doing that at the moment...
-
Originally Posted by
CB Entertainments
The difference in quality is not really that much really.
Negligible through a PA system, certainly. A hi-fi setup is a different matter, but even then....
-
another thing is i just don't trust mp3 codecs as far as i can throw them
-
Dinosaur
Originally Posted by
BeerFunk
Negligible through a PA system, certainly. A hi-fi setup is a different matter, but even then....
But Grahame's got a Hi Fi.
-
-
-
i suppose it wouldn't hurt to rip originally to WAV (store masters this way) and then convert to MP3 for usage on the road?
-
I would rip them at 320kbps MP3
-
Likes Disco-ing
Originally Posted by
Twinspin
I would rip them at 320kbps MP3
Me too, WAV is overkill on space regardless of how much storage is nowadays.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules