Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.
-
Originally Posted by
kjdiscos
Why do you think that ?. A powered sub is never going to outdo an amp'd one
...and todays most stupid post goes to...
You can't possibly generalise like that.
-
Dinosaur
-
Originally Posted by
Solitaire Entertainments Ltd
...and todays most stupid post goes to...
You can't possibly generalise like that.
So your telling me active subs are louder then any amped combination,
Again it always has to be your way solitaire doesnt it
-
Originally Posted by
kjdiscos
So your telling me active subs are louder then any amped combination,
Again it always has to be your way solitaire doesnt it
What are you talking about?
I am saying that you cannot possibly generalise. Read my post.
-
Originally Posted by
Solitaire Entertainments Ltd
What are you talking about?
I am saying that you cannot possibly generalise. Read my post.
Of course you can,
By the sheer technology in an active unit, And the size it has to house the amp heat etc etc, A passive system will always be louder,
-
Dinosaur
-
Originally Posted by
Excalibur
Listen dimwit, you're picking a fight with the wrong guy for two reasons, both of which I don't expect you to understand.
Secondly, the post you responded to (mine) states something which I think 90% of members on here believe. I lose count of the active sub users who say "I have two, but I only use one unless it's a huge gig". Actives lend themselves to this, more so than passives, unless you are running bridged, in itself a hot potato.
I'm soon going to get exasperated at this.
Edit: I've just seen KJ's last post. In my opinion, he's actually demonstrating the exact opposite of his theory. My last word on the subject.
What im actualy trying to say, Is yeah active are good,
But if you want thunderous bass, To shake the floor and bottles behind the bar etc, Your not going to get it out of an active unit
-
Originally Posted by
kjdiscos
What im actualy trying to say, Is yeah active are good,
But if you want thunderous bass, To shake the floor and bottles behind the bar etc, Your not going to get it out of an active unit
And what is this piece of information based on?
Have you ever listened to RCF, Mackie or EV active subs? Have you compared them side by side?
Have you done side by side comparisons with several hundred passive speakers and amps?
Oh, wait, yes, you are an installer for an undisclosed company, so yes you must have.
-
Originally Posted by
Solitaire Entertainments Ltd
And what is this piece of information based on?
Have you ever listened to RCF, Mackie or EV active subs? Have you compared them side by side?
Have you done side by side comparisons with several hundred passive speakers and amps?
Oh, wait, yes, you are an installer for an undisclosed company, so yes you must have.
I have listened to various active units, And they are good, But you guys are saying there better then passive units which is not the case.
They are very good and have there uses, But my point being if you want a v large ammount of spl, Then you could be looking a passive
-
Originally Posted by
kjdiscos
But if you want thunderous bass, To shake the floor and bottles behind the bar etc, Your not going to get it out of an active unit
Jake, by "active" I guess you mean "powered". Anyway, your statement is nonsense. Go listen to some F1 or Meyer powered subs, you can break windows with them , whack people in the chest with them and even create brown trousers with them up real close! Whether the amps are in a rack behind the stacks or built in to the boxes make zero difference to the volume.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules