Last edited by Penfold42; 21-04-2009 at 12:18 PM. Reason: Edit post.
Wonder who will admit to the above mail ,
Its not a post, Its a forum member emailing via our site,
Last edited by jamesh; 21-04-2009 at 12:28 PM. Reason: Tony has already edited your first post to remove the name - please don't then post BIG hints to who it is
First of all KJDiscos you are talking out of your backside. How you can generalise that passive speakers will always go louder and be bigger and better than powered/active is just BONKERS!
If you really want to generalise you could say that active/powered are actually better as the amp the manufacturers use when building them has been chosen as the best combination for the components installed... Where as if you have passive speakers and amp you could find that not everyone has your expert knowledge in pairing up speakers and amps so you run the risk of not getting the right combination for the cabs...
anyway enough on that topic....lets go on topic again...
Personally i'd go with Powered/active speakers over a powered mixer for the simple fact of what happens if they go wrong...
If your powered mixer goes wrong you potentially loose your whole sound system... Or if your lucky only the one side so you would need a backup powered mixer just in case.
Where as
It's very unlikely for both your powered/active subs (if using subs) and both your powered/active tops will all go wrong at once... If they do i wouldn't want to plug anything else into the power supply anyway as there must be something very wrong!!! So at least if one sub or on top goes down you could still limp through the night as you still have some audio at the event...
Just my 2p worth...
UK EVENT SERVICES.CO.UK
* Photo Video Guestbooks & Video Booths *
Based in Worcestershire and covering across the UK - Tel: 08456 43 48 49
James, That wasn't a hint as to who it is,
What i am saying is for somone to send abuse via a contact form on a website is very silly, I personaly think if a person has an issue pick up a phone and call dont you ?
Last edited by kjdiscos; 21-04-2009 at 12:35 PM.
I carefully avoided the word always, thus allowing leeway for the obvious exceptions.
Look at that, just what I said. Thanks.
Never say never. (And always is pretty dubious as well)
No we're not. I said "usually more powerful".
What's this? Do my old eyes deceive me? A crack in the cast iron certainty?
At last the cavalry arrive. Thanks Tony, am I glad to see you.
FWIW, I was the one who called them "active" I think, so I'll cheerfully cop the flack for that if any should be flying.
Anybody else hear the sound of the goalposts being dragged across the playing field? "Always going to be exceptions" eh? Sounds suspiciously like " As a general rule" I would have said. Wish I was better at English.
(Don't think I've ever used that smilie before. Feels good though. )
this has gone way out of the line