View Full Version : The difference between quite & quiet
rob1963
20-02-2008, 05:12 PM
Following on from last month's English lesson, this month we learn the difference between quite & quiet, as the two often seem to get mixed up. Note the position of the last two letters in each word.
QUITE = Rather. Example: "I was quite tired after last nights gig."
QUIET = Not very loud. Example: "Try and be quiet if you get home late."
Finally, an example of both words used together in the same sentence:
"My new sound system seems quite quiet compared to the last one."
Here endeth todays lesson.
:rolleyes:
Solitaire Events Ltd
20-02-2008, 05:15 PM
Repeat after me Mr James....
"I must get out more" :sj:
rob1963
20-02-2008, 05:17 PM
Repeat after me Mr James....
"I must get out more" :sj:
I don't know what the world's coming to...
...you try & help out fellow forum members, and the head cheese just takes the mickey!
:coat:
Penfold42
20-02-2008, 07:39 PM
Thank you Roz....
*get's up and hands teacher an apple*
rob1963
20-02-2008, 07:52 PM
Thank you Roz....
*get's up and hands teacher an apple*
I hope you found it quite helpful, Tony
:D :D :D
Penfold42
20-02-2008, 07:55 PM
I hope you found it quite helpful, Tony
:D :D :D
Shhh........quiet....ive' gut an hedache........:D :D :D :D
rob1963
20-02-2008, 08:03 PM
Shhh........quiet....ive' gut an hedache........:D :D :D :D
:sofa:
Vectis
20-02-2008, 09:59 PM
QUITE = Rather. Example: "I was quite tired after last nights gig."
night's, surely?
PropellerHeadCase
20-02-2008, 10:54 PM
Nice :D
rob1963
20-02-2008, 11:14 PM
Unfortunately, I have a faulty keyboard. The apostrophe does not always work.
Also, vectis, the apostrophe should be the same colour as the font, not red.
:rolleyes:
PropellerHeadCase
21-02-2008, 12:41 AM
On the contrary, editing marks are historically red.
Vectis
21-02-2008, 06:29 AM
On the contrary, editing marks are historically red.
:ner:
rob1963
21-02-2008, 08:38 AM
On the contrary, editing marks are historically red.
Maybe in New Zealand!
Vectis
21-02-2008, 08:42 AM
Maybe in New Zealand!
Just consulted Mrs VV on this... she's an English teacher... and edit marks are indeed historically red.
:ner: :ner:
Or maybe that's just a colonial island thing... :p
PropellerHeadCase
21-02-2008, 08:45 AM
Roz is getting hysterically red, methinks :D
rob1963
21-02-2008, 08:45 AM
As we obviously have some people in training for the pedants forum, what exactly are edit marks?
Vectis
21-02-2008, 08:49 AM
As we obviously have some people in training for the pedants forum, what exactly are edit marks?
Ahem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy_editing)
rob1963
21-02-2008, 08:51 AM
I know what editing is, vectis.
I was specifically asking about "edit marks"
Apart from that, Wikipedia is hardly the best source for accurate information!
Vectis
21-02-2008, 09:10 AM
I know what editing is, vectis.
I was specifically asking about "edit marks"
Apart from that, Wikipedia is hardly the best source for accurate information!
Referenced by Encarta (http://wadsworth.com/english_d/templates/student_resources/1413001890_burnett/UsageHandbook/edit_marks.htm)
And what colour are the illustrations? RED!
rob1963
21-02-2008, 09:22 AM
So they are actually proofreading marks, not editing marks!
(I'm still in training for the pedants forum).
:D :D :D
Vectis
21-02-2008, 09:24 AM
Rob, are you single by any chance? :D
(that wasn't a proposition...)
rob1963
21-02-2008, 09:26 AM
Rob, are you single by any chance? :D
(that wasn't a proposition...)
Indeed I am...
It's cheaper, less hassle & much more fun!
;)
Vectis
21-02-2008, 09:30 AM
Indeed I am...
Figures... :)
robbiedj
21-02-2008, 11:42 AM
Next week's lesson:-
The use of there, their & they're. :D
rob1963
21-02-2008, 11:46 AM
Next week's lesson:-
The use of there, their & they're. :D
Ahem...
http://www.mobilediscodirectory.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=10626
:D :D :D
robbiedj
21-02-2008, 01:38 PM
Well, sorry about that must have missed it. :sorry:
But perhaps we should have exams because I don't think the class has learnt that one yet. :Naughty:
rob1963
21-02-2008, 02:18 PM
But perhaps we should have exams because I don't think the class has learnt that one yet. :Naughty:
Indeed.
There are still many occasions where the three are used incorrectly.
Excalibur
21-02-2008, 09:09 PM
Following on from last month's English lesson, this month we learn the difference between quite & quiet, as the two often seem to get mixed up. Note the position of the last two letters in each word.
QUITE = Rather. Example: "I was quite tired after last nights gig."
QUIET = Not very loud. Example: "Try and be quiet if you get home late."
Finally, an example of both words used together in the same sentence:
"My new sound system seems quite quiet compared to the last one."
Here endeth todays lesson.
:rolleyes:
I didn't know you'd changed to Active? :D :D :D
Unfortunately, I have a faulty keyboard. The apostrophe does not always work.
Also, vectis, the apostrophe should be the same colour as the font, not red.
:rolleyes:
I think it may have been a visual aid , Roy. ;) :D
Corabar Steve
22-02-2008, 07:37 AM
My teachers always corrected in red
rob1963
22-02-2008, 09:36 AM
My teachers always corrected in red
So did mine, but childrens school books & forums on computers are not quite the same thing.
Corabar Steve
22-02-2008, 09:46 AM
It was a correction, ergo it was in red
rob1963
22-02-2008, 09:50 AM
It was a correction, ergo it was in red
Well I haven't noticed many corrections on this forum which are in red.
Corabar Steve
22-02-2008, 09:58 AM
So it's not always done correctly (pun intended) but in this instance it was.
robbiedj
22-02-2008, 10:01 AM
My teachers always corrected in red
This is discouraged now, as it may upset the little ones seeing nasty red writing all over their work. :D
Corabar Steve
22-02-2008, 10:04 AM
Sod 'em! :sj:
PropellerHeadCase
22-02-2008, 10:31 AM
This is discouraged now, as it may upset the little ones seeing nasty red writing all over their work. :D
Which merely makes the reality of the real world that much harder to bear when they finally get there.
robbiedj
22-02-2008, 03:17 PM
Which merely makes the reality of the real world that much harder to bear when they finally get there.
It might be different in NZ, but here we have had years of no competitive sports in schools because the non-sporty kids feel bad about it, so, surprise, there are even less budding athletes coming through. No end-of-term class placing, as those who came last would be upset.
Anything that could make one kid feel out of it was frowned upon. Now they have begun to realise that, yes, you do need some competition in schools or they cannot fit into REAL life.
It's too late for some, though. They already think the world owes them a living. :bang:
theoloyla
22-02-2008, 03:56 PM
It might be different in NZ, but here we have had years of no competitive sports in schools because the non-sporty kids feel bad about it, so, surprise, there are even less budding athletes coming through. No end-of-term class placing, as those who came last would be upset.
Anything that could make one kid feel out of it was frowned upon. Now they have begun to realise that, yes, you do need some competition in schools or they cannot fit into REAL life.
It's too late for some, though. They already think the world owes them a living. :bang:
How true! Life is a competition.
BeerFunk
22-02-2008, 04:36 PM
I was of the last generation of kids who didn't have mobile phones or readily available internet access, so I feel qualified to speak! If Whitney is right, and children are our future, we are in bigger trouble than we might think. When you look at the rapid development of other parts of the world, where the people appreciate everything they have - you'd have to draw the conclusion that our general economy and standard of living will slide as theirs grows.
rob1963
22-02-2008, 04:51 PM
If Whitney is right, and children are our future, we are in bigger trouble than we might think.
Indeed.
I think that's a VERY worrying thought!
PropellerHeadCase
22-02-2008, 07:41 PM
It might be different in NZ, but here we have had years of no competitive sports in schools because the non-sporty kids feel bad about it, so, surprise, there are even less budding athletes coming through. No end-of-term class placing, as those who came last would be upset.
Anything that could make one kid feel out of it was frowned upon. Now they have begun to realise that, yes, you do need some competition in schools or they cannot fit into REAL life.
It's too late for some, though. They already think the world owes them a living. :bang:
Yeah, not so much in the sports, but in academics... secondary schooling is now a joke - out with the A+ to F scale in with the pass or not pass :bang:
How is a university supposed to be able to differentiate between someone who scraped through and someone who aces every exam? They can't.
Home-schooling is rapidly becoming a very attractive option: I can cover Maths, English and the Sciences and Jo can help with the Sciences and cover the languages, she speaks five (Portuguese, Spanish, French, Italian and, of course, English).
Corabar Steve
23-02-2008, 09:44 AM
Too late to cancel the move Al?
Dragonfly
23-02-2008, 09:50 AM
It might be different in NZ, but here we have had years of no competitive sports in schools because the non-sporty kids feel bad about it, so, surprise, there are even less budding athletes coming through. No end-of-term class placing, as those who came last would be upset.
Anything that could make one kid feel out of it was frowned upon. Now they have begun to realise that, yes, you do need some competition in schools or they cannot fit into REAL life.
It's too late for some, though. They already think the world owes them a living. :bang:
Indeed , in a previous life as a teaching assitstant i worked with several PRIMARY school children whose aspiration it was to "do nothing just get the dole like my dad" very very sad.
I had a grammer school upbringing and rightly or wrongly am a great supporter of that system.
theoloyla
24-02-2008, 03:38 PM
Indeed , in a previous life as a teaching assitstant i worked with several PRIMARY school children whose aspiration it was to "do nothing just get the dole like my dad" very very sad.
I had a grammer school upbringing and rightly or wrongly am a great supporter of that system.
Me too!!! Comprehensive schools when they were first introduced in the 60's were supposed to be really big and offer more choice and streaming - not just lower every kid to the bottom.
Excalibur
24-02-2008, 03:44 PM
Indeed , in a previous life as a teaching assitstant i worked with several PRIMARY school children whose aspiration it was to "do nothing just get the dole like my dad" very very sad.
I had a grammer school upbringing and rightly or wrongly am a great supporter of that system.
Snap. It may be unfashionable now, but it worked well. Sadly, all vestiges of ambition and striving for achievement and betterment seeem to have all but disappeared. :bang:
PropellerHeadCase
24-02-2008, 06:43 PM
Too late to cancel the move Al?
Why, Steve? The problem seems to be endemic in English-speaking Western nations, but there are more internationally recognised alternatives to the standard testing schema available in the UK than in NZ.
BeerFunk
24-02-2008, 08:30 PM
Me too!!! Comprehensive schools when they were first introduced in the 60's were supposed to be really big and offer more choice and streaming - not just lower every kid to the bottom.
Yep, and on the same note, I'd like to see money invested to fast track the kids with above average ability - regardless of their background.
rob1963
24-02-2008, 08:33 PM
Yep, and on the same note, I'd like to see money invested to fast track the kids with above average ability - regardless of their background.
Is it me, or is this starting to get a bit political?
:sofa:
Solitaire Events Ltd
24-02-2008, 09:31 PM
Is it me, or is this starting to get a bit political?
:sofa:
Slightly.
Let's not go there please guys.
rob1963
24-02-2008, 10:05 PM
So far, I've given training on there, their & they're...
...and also on quite & quiet.
I think I might do here & hear next!
:D
Solitaire Events Ltd
24-02-2008, 10:09 PM
Or Rob, Ron, Roz and Roy. :sj:
Excalibur
24-02-2008, 10:10 PM
So far, I've given training on there, their & they're...
...and also on quite & quiet.
I think I might do here & hear next!
:D
Well for a start then, explain how " Here Here " is not how you concur with someone. I'm sick of seeing that one.:bang:
Must be my Grammar School education.;)
Curses, political input, and willy waving in the same post. Now I'm in trouble.
:(
kilmeedyman
24-02-2008, 10:13 PM
or why you haven't been 'hear and their'
PropellerHeadCase
24-02-2008, 10:50 PM
Hear here, Roz!
And if you're in NZ you can sadly add 'hare' and 'hair' to that, and sometimes 'air', 'heir', 'ear', 'ere', 'e'er' :(
rob1963
24-02-2008, 10:54 PM
On a similar subject, can anyone tell me if the phrase "well known people" should have a hyphen between the words well & known?
I've tried Googling it, but found many examples of both options, so I'm a bit confused...not that it takes much!
:D
PropellerHeadCase
24-02-2008, 11:21 PM
Optional, Rob, either/or. Personally I prefer the hyphen.
rob1963
24-02-2008, 11:33 PM
Optional, Rob, either/or. Personally I prefer the hyphen.
Thanks, Al.
I thought you'd know the answer.
:beerchug:
Corabar Steve
25-02-2008, 08:00 AM
Or Rob, Ron, Roz and Roy. :sj:You forgot Rog & Rod
Well for a start then, explain how " Here Here " is not how you concur with someone.
:(
Hear Hear, that one really get's my goat. :sj:
rob1963
25-02-2008, 09:35 AM
Or Rob, Ron, Roz and Roy. :sj:
You forgot Rog & Rod
I noticed that too, but I chose not to mention it...as I didn't want to encourage him!
Vectis
25-02-2008, 01:42 PM
Here you go Rob, save you the trouble:
http://www.cooper.com/alan/homonym_list.html
rob1963
25-02-2008, 02:20 PM
Here you go Rob, save you the trouble:
http://www.cooper.com/alan/homonym_list.html
Wow!...thanks vectis!
I already knew them all, though!
:whistle:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.