PDA

View Full Version : Subzero Entertainment Website



SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 11:54 AM
Hi all, id appreciate it if you could take at a look at www.subzeroentertainment.co.uk (http://www.subzeroentertainment.co.uk) and let me know what you think.

Its all been designed and created by my self :)

Thanks

Aaron

Shaun
24-01-2013, 12:00 PM
My Anti-Virus blocked your site!!

15335

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 12:02 PM
Well, ive never seen that happen before! :O

Its completely safe by the way! :)

Shaun
24-01-2013, 12:05 PM
Well, ive never seen that happen before! :O

Its completely safe by the way! :)

Maybe so, but my AV has denied access so I've really no way of knowing if it's safe or not. If that's the case you have to consider how many potential customers of yours are being denied too. Something you need to look into. :beer1:

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 12:06 PM
thanks Shaun, will do!

Vectis
24-01-2013, 12:56 PM
Its all been designed and created by my self :)


What, including the picture below which has been STOLEN from www.thepartydj.co.uk and is copyrighted to Chris Harmer at www.innovationimages.co.uk, both of whom have now been informed with links to this thread and the screenshot below?

(at least you can't blame your "web designer" after the statement above!)

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 01:03 PM
Vectis, you are must be seeing a cached version of the website.

Those images have been off the site for maybe 2 days now, they were used for test purposes only on the site, and the site has never been live with them pictures on it.

Vectis
24-01-2013, 01:04 PM
Funny that.

Oh look, as if by magic the slideshow is gone.

Well I never.

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 01:09 PM
Yes like i said, the images were for test purposes only, the site has only been live for a couple of days. At no point was they meant to be "stolen" for the websites benefit.

I designed the website, so i take responsibility for using the images.

simple as that

Vectis
24-01-2013, 01:10 PM
Don't suppose you know what I do for a living?

(by the way, I'm not a DJ)

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 01:10 PM
Webmaster, Web Designer, IT Consultant. Owner of needadisco.com, needaweddingdisco.com, djmark.org

Marc J
24-01-2013, 02:16 PM
Same as Shaun (EliteDJ) here, AV has blocked it.

DeckstarDeluxe
24-01-2013, 02:20 PM
First impressions.....its very bland.....

- - - Updated - - -

First impressions.....its very bland.....

Vectis
24-01-2013, 02:24 PM
Webmaster, Web Designer, IT Consultant. Owner of needadisco.com, needaweddingdisco.com, djmark.org

Good with the old Copy & Paste, aren't we :rolleyes:

My BSc is in Computer and Digital Forensics by the way.


Cached? ...

15341


Anyway, good to see it's gone. Not sure the owners will be as nice.

yourdj
24-01-2013, 02:38 PM
What, including the picture below which has been STOLEN from www.thepartydj.co.uk and is copyrighted to Chris Harmer at www.innovationimages.co.uk, both of whom have now been informed with links to this thread and the screenshot below?

(at least you can't blame your "web designer" after the statement above!)

That is indeed Paul Taylors photo or the one he uses on his website. :)
Not a very flattering picture at all imo for a wedding site anyway, but all the same.
Nice shot though even if it is a fluke (its the other persons flash that makes it look like that) ;)


I like the logo you have on the site. :) The design is also quite contemporary.

WWDJ
24-01-2013, 02:39 PM
Well no AV issues for me, but the image on the front page doesn't really inspire me, speaking as another DJ of course.

Navigation is a bit confusing, do you really need 'Latest News' ... no-one cares, they just want to see what you are offering.

I think your pictures could be a lot better, in fact it says on your wedding page

"Don’t just take our word for it though: we've got tons of images for you to have a look at to see for yourself! " ...

... why not show some ?

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 04:05 PM
Good with the old Copy & Paste, aren't we :rolleyes:

My BSc is in Computer and Digital Forensics by the way.


Cached? ...

15341


Anyway, good to see it's gone. Not sure the owners will be as nice.

That's actually quite strange, because i am at University in my 4th year studying Digital Forensics & Network Security, currently working for Cisco, so i know my stuff too :)

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 04:07 PM
Well no AV issues for me, but the image on the front page doesn't really inspire me, speaking as another DJ of course.

Navigation is a bit confusing, do you really need 'Latest News' ... no-one cares, they just want to see what you are offering.

I think your pictures could be a lot better, in fact it says on your wedding page

"Don’t just take our word for it though: we've got tons of images for you to have a look at to see for yourself! " ...

... why not show some ?

Thank you for your comments, i agree, its not not a finish article by no means. I am working on getting some pictures for the website from events. The latest news section has to go, i agree, once again it was put there to fill a space not for a final product.

i am doing this website part time in between university and working

thanks :)

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 04:09 PM
That is indeed Paul Taylors photo or the one he uses on his website. :)
Not a very flattering picture at all imo for a wedding site anyway, but all the same.
Nice shot though even if it is a fluke (its the other persons flash that makes it look like that) ;)


I like the logo you have on the site. :) The design is also quite contemporary.

Thanks for your comments :)

i have tried to keep it as contemporary as possible, i have a load of over crowded busy DJ websites, which just look confusing, and i just bounce right off them!

Thank you

DeckstarDeluxe
24-01-2013, 04:09 PM
That's actually quite strange, because i am at University in my 4th year studying Digital Forensics & Network Security, currently working for Cisco, so i know my stuff too :)


If that is the case then why the heck was your website getting blocked by two forum members browsers?

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 04:17 PM
If that is the case then why the heck was your website getting blocked by two forum members browsers?

Well i dont know Deckstar, if i did, then the problem wouldn't exist would it.

Maybe their firewall is extremely strict. I have viewed the website on many computers, on different networks and not once have i seen the issue, so its nice to know it exists, so it can be rectified.


and it very much is the case.

mkindy
24-01-2013, 04:22 PM
friendly lot here arnt we........;)

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 04:23 PM
friendly lot here arnt we........;)

Seems so :)

Jiggles
24-01-2013, 04:33 PM
Could be a number of issues some website thats on the same IP could be hosting something nasty, the domain was already black listed and hasn't been removed yet. The fact that Google Chrome hasn't said anything about it means that its more than likely a false positive. May be an idea to speak to these AV companies. :)

Marc J
24-01-2013, 04:47 PM
Well i dont know Deckstar, if i did, then the problem wouldn't exist would it.

Maybe their firewall is extremely strict. I have viewed the website on many computers, on different networks and not once have i seen the issue, so its nice to know it exists, so it can be rectified.

and it very much is the case.


Could be a number of issues some website thats on the same IP could be hosting something nasty, the domain was already black listed and hasn't been removed yet. The fact that Google Chrome hasn't said anything about it means that its more than likely a false positive. May be an idea to speak to these AV companies. :)

I don't think it's the IP (although that may be one factor) and I doubt it's a false positive. Although the domain may not currectly be infected, according to my AV (and checking through the Wayback Machine) it hosted an HTML/ScrInject.B.Gen virus problem as far back as March 2011...

NOTE - DON'T VISIT THIS URL UNLESS YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY SURE YOUR ANTI-VIRUS IS GOING TO BLOCK IT!

http://web.archive.org/web/20100328030541/http://www.subzeroentertainment.co.uk/

funkymook
24-01-2013, 05:03 PM
First impressions - it doesn't look or read any different to loads of other DJ sites (especially now :D).

What do you believe is there that makes you stand out from any other site a potential client might visit? What do you do or what angle do you have that's different enough to attract attention?

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 05:03 PM
I don't think it's the IP (although that may be one factor) and I doubt it's a false positive. Although the domain may not currectly be infected, according to my AV (and checking through the Wayback Machine) it hosted an HTML/ScrInject.B.Gen virus problem as far back as March 2011...

NOTE - DON'T VISIT THIS URL UNLESS YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY SURE YOUR ANTI-VIRUS IS GOING TO BLOCK IT!



thanks for that link Marc

i was never aware that we had an issue with the domain back in 2011, as you can see by the footer of the page, the website was designed and made by somebody else until i decided to give it a go. i will look further into this

WWDJ
24-01-2013, 05:26 PM
You need to look at grabbing the customers attention from the off.

We've discussed the banner picture in your other thread, but the website doesn't tell the customer anything about you until they dig further. They won't, trust me.
If you ask me, the huge banner picture is wasting space where you can tell the customer about you. Maybe reduce the size?
Try perhaps producing a promo video showing people dancing or perhaps people dancing in pictures.
Customers are interested in whether you are going to get bums off seats and on the dancefloor, not whether you have great setup. (Setup pics are good to validate your setup is smart but nothing more).

Make friends here and take a look at some of our websites. Personally I have spent a lot of time working on mine, it's not professionally done, but it is hopefully well laid out and engages the user pretty quickly with text, photos and videos, all without leaving the home page.

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 05:32 PM
You need to look at grabbing the customers attention from the off.

We've discussed the banner picture in your other thread, but the website doesn't tell the customer anything about you until they dig further. They won't, trust me.
If you ask me, the huge banner picture is wasting space where you can tell the customer about you. Maybe reduce the size?
Try perhaps producing a promo video showing people dancing or perhaps people dancing in pictures.
Customers are interested in whether you are going to get bums off seats and on the dancefloor, not whether you have great setup. (Setup pics are good to validate your setup is smart but nothing more).

Make friends here and take a look at some of our websites. Personally I have spent a lot of time working on mine, it's not professionally done, but it is hopefully well laid out and engages the user pretty quickly with text, photos and videos, all without leaving the home page.

thank you for the comment Dave, you've touched on some very good point on which i agree on. The banner is too large with out a doubt. I have just visited your website, and i must say its actually very good, one the better ones ive seen.

I am here to make friends, and discuss, that's what forums are about :) sometimes people use it to air the dirty laundry.

thanks

DeckstarDeluxe
24-01-2013, 05:43 PM
thank you for the comment Dave, you've touched on some very good point on which i agree on. The banner is too large with out a doubt. I have just visited your website, and i must say its actually very good, one the better ones ive seen.

I am here to make friends, and discuss, that's what forums are about :) sometimes people use it to air the dirty laundry.

thanks


Just shoot straight dice and remember when folks write something down the tone it is intended in doesn't always transfer across.

I'm sure dozens of members will vouch how much they have learnt from the forum and how its improved their game no end (myself included)

Solitaire Events Ltd
24-01-2013, 06:19 PM
Yeah, Neil and I loved each other when we first met on here...:zip:

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 06:26 PM
Yeah, Neil and I loved each other when we first met on here...:zip:

I think its just a matter of pride, and we don't like to hear other peoples thoughts, especially when people put effort in to something, but that's why we sign up to forums right? to get comments and direction :)

Solitaire Events Ltd
24-01-2013, 06:47 PM
I think its just a matter of pride, and we don't like to hear other peoples thoughts, especially when people put effort in to something, but that's why we sign up to forums right? to get comments and direction :)

It takes a while to get to know people and their sense of humour and the way they post.

You will get plenty of help from here and believe me, I have made some very very good friends on here.

I take it you'd like me to ignore your email that you sent? :)

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 06:49 PM
It takes a while to get to know people and their sense of humour and the way they post.

You will get plenty of help from here and believe me, I have made some very very good friends on here.

I take it you'd like me to ignore your email that you sent? :)


I look forward to it! :)

and yes, please :rolleyes:

WWDJ
24-01-2013, 08:24 PM
It takes a while to get to know people and their sense of humour and the way they post.

You will get plenty of help from here and believe me, I have made some very very good friends on here.

I take it you'd like me to ignore your email that you sent? :)

Even Darren ^^^ is ok in real life ... no ... really he is!! :) ... and we agree on very little (cough Imac ...)

yourdj
24-01-2013, 08:55 PM
I think its just a matter of pride, and we don't like to hear other peoples thoughts, especially when people put effort in to something, but that's why we sign up to forums right? to get comments and direction :)

They are getting a bit of a slating IMO although using other peoples pics has not helped (especially as its one of my best friends).

Even so - putting a site of rig pic up here for approval is a monumental step for any operator so some sort of praise must be granted IMO.
90% of operators stay in their own bubble (and many stay in a time warp) although those stats are non scientific :p

I am proof of the pudding and still have a long way to go and I have had many interesting comments from (the actually very pleasant) DT.

I think after 5000 comments I can get away with that - bit like being in prison. Delete me if you want :Kiss 3: I am a naughty but compliant inmate.

SubzeroEntertertainment
24-01-2013, 10:03 PM
They are getting a bit of a slating IMO although using other peoples pics has not helped (especially as its one of my best friends).

Even so - putting a site of rig pic up here for approval is a monumental step for any operator so some sort of praise must be granted IMO.
90% of operators stay in their own bubble (and many stay in a time warp) although those stats are non scientific :p

I am proof of the pudding and still have a long way to go and I have had many interesting comments from (the actually very pleasant) DT.

I think after 5000 comments I can get away with that - bit like being in prison. Delete me if you want :Kiss 3: I am a naughty but compliant inmate.


Well i deserved it, not Subzero, but me personally deserved it. So don't hold anything against the company for the use of someone else's picture, that lies solely with me :)

It is, and our rig/setup has only been seen by customers or friends & family, whom of which, have only good things to say, which you'd expect! Thats why i joined the forum, to see how we can improve, along with meeting new people & friends! :)

Marc J
25-01-2013, 08:48 AM
A mod might want to disable the link in the quote part of post #27. I specifically disabled it in my original post to avoid accidental click throughs to the infected page, and so that MDD wasn't linking to harmful content, which wouldn't do you any favours either.

PS, site is still blocked for me....

Corabar Steve
25-01-2013, 09:04 AM
A mod might want to disable the link in the quote part of post #27. I specifically disabled it in my original post to avoid accidental click throughs to the infected page, and so that MDD wasn't linking to harmful content, which wouldn't do you any favours either.


I've removed it.

SubzeroEntertertainment
25-01-2013, 09:07 AM
A mod might want to disable the link in the quote part of post #27. I specifically disabled it in my original post to avoid accidental click throughs to the infected page, and so that MDD wasn't linking to harmful content, which wouldn't do you any favours either.

PS, site is still blocked for me....

i contacted my hosting company last night Marc and told them of my concern when i found out about this and how it could be stopping potential business. i am hoping to hear back from them soon.

i will keep you updated with what they say :)

Paul The Party Dj
25-01-2013, 09:35 AM
Just back from my January holiday.

Thanks Vectis for acting on my behalf.

Subzero - I'm sure you won't be doing that again.

Toby - the photographer used a remote flash to get that effect - nothing to do with fluke, I thought a pro like you would have realised that. As to your comment about it not being a "flattering picture" - it's two real people who are very much in love. I'll never use stock images to get beautiful people.

Every picture on my site is from my events (well actually there's still one stock shot but it's nothing to do with a wedding). I believe using pictures from other peoples events is misrepresentation.

Peace & Love

Marc J
25-01-2013, 09:48 AM
The fact that Google Chrome hasn't said anything about it means that its more than likely a false positive.

Seriously? I'm pretty sure Chrome's block list is linked to the Google Safe Diagnostics database. While this is handy, it relies on Google having previous data on the site in question and offers no protection for recent threats.


i contacted my hosting company last night Marc and told them of my concern when i found out about this and how it could be stopping potential business. i am hoping to hear back from them soon.

i will keep you updated with what they say :)

Unfortunately the damage is now done, it seems some time ago. We know that at least one Antivirus company (Shaun and I both use ESET AntiVirus) lists your domain as potentially dangerous as it has, in the past, hosted infected files.

The good news is, Google Safe Diagnostics does now list the site in question as safe (http://google.co.uk/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=www.subzeroentertainment.co.uk/) so it may be just a matter of time before you get yourself off the blacklist at AV companies.

Unfortunately, since the domain hosted infected files for so long, there might not be a quick fix. Changing hosting companies wouldn't help, either, as it's your domain that appears to be blacklisted.

Since there's only one AV company that we know for sure has your domain blacklisted, you could start there: http://kb.eset.com/esetkb/index?page=content&id=SOLN141&ref=wsf

Solitaire Events Ltd
25-01-2013, 09:56 AM
Anti virus, what's that? :sofa:

Pink Elephant
25-01-2013, 11:38 AM
Just because you have crossed over to the iSide ;)

Corabar Entertainment
25-01-2013, 11:45 AM
Anti virus, what's that? :sofa:


Just because you have crossed over to the iSide ;)

...and today's 'Suckered In' award goes to Neil at Pink Elephant!

:lol:

Solitaire Events Ltd
25-01-2013, 12:21 PM
Just because you have crossed over to the iSide ;)

:lol:

I still have more Windows based PCs as it stands. ;)

SubzeroEntertertainment
25-01-2013, 02:02 PM
Since there's only one AV company that we know for sure has your domain blacklisted, you could start there: http://kb.eset.com/esetkb/index?page=content&id=SOLN141&ref=wsf

Thanks for the info, i have contacted eset and i hope to hear back from them soon. I will let you know what they say. Thanks for bringing all this to my attention by the way, i appreciate it :)

SubzeroEntertertainment
25-01-2013, 02:46 PM
Just an update on the whole AV issue with eset. Keep me informed if it does get unblocked, thanks :)

15353

LeapCreative
25-01-2013, 03:13 PM
Site is nice, good job on the responsiveness. Maybe add a splash more colour to enhance it slightly?

Everything is laid out pretty nicely, although a quick suggestion is to remove the drop down for 'more', as there's only one sub link, so it kinda defeats the purpose. I'd also be tempted to add an extra 5px margin to the right hand side of each text container, simply so the text isn't going right up to the edge.

Good job though :)

Also, weird question, but those Blackberry roller's - have they always said that on them? Or have they been photoshopped?

SubzeroEntertertainment
25-01-2013, 03:23 PM
Site is nice, good job on the responsiveness. Maybe add a splash more colour to enhance it slightly?

Everything is laid out pretty nicely, although a quick suggestion is to remove the drop down for 'more', as there's only one sub link, so it kinda defeats the purpose. I'd also be tempted to add an extra 5px margin to the right hand side of each text container, simply so the text isn't going right up to the edge.

Good job though :)

Also, weird question, but those Blackberry roller's - have they always said that on them? Or have they been photoshopped?

Thanks for your advice :) ill look into it. The "more" drop down list is something i have addressed already, and i will be dealing with that when i get some spare time :)

The banners were provided by BlackBerry at the event, they have nothing to do with us, we just put them next to our setup for photo purposes :)

i have more pictures of the signs somewhere if you'd like to see another example?

thanks

SubzeroEntertertainment
25-01-2013, 03:25 PM
Also, weird question, but those Blackberry roller's - have they always said that on them? Or have they been photoshopped?

the original picture that can be seen in the website banner :)

15354

Marc J
27-01-2013, 07:40 AM
Just an update on the whole AV issue with eset. Keep me informed if it does get unblocked, thanks :)

Working fine for me now...

yourdj
27-01-2013, 08:48 AM
Just back from my January holiday.

Thanks Vectis for acting on my behalf.

Subzero - I'm sure you won't be doing that again.

Toby - the photographer used a remote flash to get that effect - nothing to do with fluke, I thought a pro like you would have realised that. As to your comment about it not being a "flattering picture" - it's two real people who are very much in love. I'll never use stock images to get beautiful people.

Every picture on my site is from my events (well actually there's still one stock shot but it's nothing to do with a wedding). I believe using pictures from other peoples events is misrepresentation.

Peace & Love

It looks like some woman is holding the flash in that case and not taking a photo at the same time?
An assistant getting in shot is even worse than a flash fluke :p

Nice photo as I said, I personally think you have better ones as the main photo for the site.
Good you don't use stock images too. Wish I could say the same but the country shots are more fitting.

;)

SubzeroEntertertainment
27-01-2013, 09:04 AM
Working fine for me now...

Thanks for letting me know Marc! :) I hope thats the end of the blocking issues for everyone!

Shaun
27-01-2013, 09:10 AM
Fine for me too now.

SubzeroEntertertainment
27-01-2013, 09:20 AM
Fine for me too now.

Thanks Shaun

Excalibur
27-01-2013, 10:06 AM
I'm sure dozens of members will vouch how much they have learnt from the forum and how its improved their game no end (myself included)
At a cost! :cry:

Money well spent, actually.



It takes a while to get to know people and their sense of humour and the way they post.

The words on the screen convey no inflexions, nor facial expressions. It is all too easy to misconstrue.


Even Darren ^^^ is ok in real life ... no ... really he is!! :) ... and we agree on very little (cough Imac ...)

I'm baffled? What has hair removal cream got to do with anything? :daft:

JAMdisco
28-01-2013, 10:51 AM
Just had a look at the site and although not bad, there are a few areas that need looking into, one of which is:

"All consultations are FREE and non oblictuary of course."

Is oblictuary actually a real word??? Did you mean obligatory?

Also you have 'tons' of pics? The link provided from this goes to 6 pictures...

The videos could be improved too, there is one of a pre-event setup - very wobbly and unprofessional looking (obviously not set up on a tripod) and also too long (1:04) as too is the birthday video at 3:00 long.

Just my opinion obviously and I know it's work-in-progress. Well done on sorting out the AV issue though - that could have been a BIG problem...

JAMdisco
28-01-2013, 10:56 AM
It looks like some woman is holding the flash in that case and not taking a photo at the same time?
An assistant getting in shot is even worse than a flash fluke :p

Nice photo as I said, I personally think you have better ones as the main photo for the site.
Good you don't use stock images too. Wish I could say the same but the country shots are more fitting.

;)

Don't want to turn this into a photography debate but I agree, if it's not a fluke, having the assistant in the photo is a no-no. Ever heard of Photoshop lol?
Alternatively, the 'assistant' could have positioned themselves behind the couple (perhaps crouched down) to get the flash right behind them, this, used with fill-in flash either on or off camera would look stunning.

SubzeroEntertertainment
28-01-2013, 01:07 PM
Just had a look at the site and although not bad, there are a few areas that need looking into, one of which is:

"All consultations are FREE and non oblictuary of course."

Is oblictuary actually a real word??? Did you mean obligatory?

Also you have 'tons' of pics? The link provided from this goes to 6 pictures...

The videos could be improved too, there is one of a pre-event setup - very wobbly and unprofessional looking (obviously not set up on a tripod) and also too long (1:04) as too is the birthday video at 3:00 long.

Just my opinion obviously and I know it's work-in-progress. Well done on sorting out the AV issue though - that could have been a BIG problem...

Thanks for your comments :) I have changed the spelling now, (thank you!)

Pictures - I'm working on a photo gallery that will display all the images. At the moment the 6 pictures are temporary, im aware its not ideal :banghead:

Videos - Agreed, they are shaky. We have recently purchased a HD video camera, which will give us higher quality videos.

yourdj
28-01-2013, 07:40 PM
Don't want to turn this into a photography debate but I agree, if it's not a fluke, having the assistant in the photo is a no-no. Ever heard of Photoshop lol?
Alternatively, the 'assistant' could have positioned themselves behind the couple (perhaps crouched down) to get the flash right behind them, this, used with fill-in flash either on or off camera would look stunning.

Or they could have used a tripod :p and taken it when it was as you say when in the right position.

like this: Less energy as people are still sitting down however which is not good at all.
15369

Here is another one - is it isn't it - who cares in reality tbh as long as its a good pic :p

15370

Much classier IMO. Paul is going to get the hump with me now. :zip:
I will buy him an orange and lemonade at our DJ meet tomorrow - that will sort it.

Paul The Party Dj
29-01-2013, 07:44 AM
Much classier IMO. Paul is going to get the hump with me now. :zip:
I will buy him an orange and lemonade at our DJ meet tomorrow - that will sort it.

Better be a pint of orange juice and lemonade just a little bit of ice - thanks :p

Peace & Love

P.S. mine has bubbles - blatant health and safety contravention lol

yourdj
29-01-2013, 08:00 AM
Better be a pint of orange juice and lemonade just a little bit of ice - thanks :p

Peace & Love

P.S. mine has bubbles - blatant health and safety contravention lol

I would hope so with a lemonade Paul :)

JAMdisco
29-01-2013, 02:06 PM
here's a couple with no people (and also using natural light so no stands required lol)

15371

15372