We've all probably seen news items about (mainly American) wedding/party suppliers (Cake makers and DJs) being sued for discriminating again same-sex couples. That's not something that would ever be an issue for me personally HOWEVER, reading today about the possibility of David Cameron recinding the ban on fox hunting - which is something I DO find morally distasteful - it got me thinking.
I entertained at a local Hunt's Annual Ball earlier this year, and while I felt a little uncomfortable, I decided that because - at least ostensibly - they operated within the law and foxes had not be harmed I was in enough of a grey area to continue with the booking despite my personal views. I performed for them to the best of my ability.
However, imagining ahead, if they group returned to 'traditional' blood-sport practices, my personal conscience would feel a lot more compromised. I did notice that this year the enquiry came phrased as simply a "social-group annual dinner-dance" - with me only discovering the nature of the group later on after saying the date was available and beginning the booking process.
I'd never dream to 'preach' to the hunt-master on my particular viewpoint, but really don't know how I could honestly do the job well with the personal distaste I'd be experiencing.
I suppose the same is true for others who choose not to work for other groups, such as travellers, or weddings for members of certain religious groups/cults. Is it only discrimination if one *expresses* why you're turning down work after you've agreed to do it in principle?
How would YOU legally and tactfully back out of a booking which offended your own personal moral compass?
DISCUSS.